A scientist is at a dinosaur dig site, and is approached by a young man of 30 years in age. The young man begins to ask the scientist questions about the dig site, the dinosaur species and science in general. The young man then says –
Young Man: This science is your religion?
Scientist: Religion? No. This is science. My views are not closed in by religion.
Young Man: But Sir, according to definition, religion is a set of beliefs, attached to a specific field. Is this not so?
Scientist: I suppose, but with science, I work with evidence to answer questions and find truth about the earth and universe.
Young Man: True, but can it not also be said that science is your religion?
Scientist: No, I don’t believe so. Religion keeps man in ignorance.
Young Man: Well then, let me ask you this question. If I were a foolish youth, who looked at you and your work and said, “You weren’t there millions of years ago. How in the world can you know anything about the dinosaurs? This is utter nonsense!” And when you tried to explain such things to me as the scientific method and other truths and research, I denied and walked away saying, “Sounds far fetched!” What would you say?
Scientist: I would say that you are not open minded and foolish, but you can’t get rid of the evidence.
Young Man: Great response! Now this is your religion. A system of beliefs, wherein you can research, ask questions and get results.
Scientist: When you put it that way then yes.
Young Man: OK. So it is with other types of religion. You may look at them and say, “This is far fetched!” But you can’t get rid of the evidence. The only difference between you and the foolish youth, is that he scoffed at science, and you scoff at religion. You may think you are being open minded, but you deny looking into the reasonings, methods and steps of religion, just as the foolish man didn’t want to explore, or even listen to your religion of science. We could ALL stand to be a little more open minded, whatever the religion.
Science and true religion work together, as long as both are correct. For some however, even evidence isn’t enough.